You've written a Brilliant article this morning β Sam. The brainwashed Fox channel viewers are so beguiled at this point, I don't know how they'll ever be able to contribute to society ever again. Rupert Murdock will die with a Smile on his face, it will be a Job Well Done. Thank You and will reStack ASAP π―ππΊπ²πππ
Thank you for the reference to your organization. Your analysis of the "poll-dancing" Rs are doing is spot on and well documented. The statistical techniques used in most polling are ill-suited to gauging future human behavior for a host of reasons that do not apply to techniques involving sampling of inanimate objects or process conditions, yet they seek to clothe themselves with the same aura of reliability that manufacturing sampling processes for QC have earned. As you state in the referenced article, at best, polls can give an indication of momentum, but cannot attest to its depth or longevity. Thank you for your analysis. I look forward to reading your newsletter.
Thank you for explaining the odd ball polling. I have internally believed and seen Kamala doing very well as the latest early election numbers blatantly reveal. Your take on the polling numbers being monetarily skewed makes sense as even Trump himself gave away the game during the Stormy Daniels hush money trial. Some of the testimony was releated to calling a polling house to ask how much it would be for a skewed poll. When the Trump campaign has near endless billionaire money. What we see is the innevitable result. The majority of folks joyessly supporting Kamala Harris and voting in droves (ie Georgia) and the polls telling us something completely different. Polls as gaslighting and discouragement just like you said.
You've written a Brilliant article this morning β Sam. The brainwashed Fox channel viewers are so beguiled at this point, I don't know how they'll ever be able to contribute to society ever again. Rupert Murdock will die with a Smile on his face, it will be a Job Well Done. Thank You and will reStack ASAP π―ππΊπ²πππ
Thanks so much Karen.
How to fool people by dumping BS poll results
https://thedemlabs.org/2024/10/15/republicans-weaponize-polls-to-fool-democrats/
Thank you for the reference to your organization. Your analysis of the "poll-dancing" Rs are doing is spot on and well documented. The statistical techniques used in most polling are ill-suited to gauging future human behavior for a host of reasons that do not apply to techniques involving sampling of inanimate objects or process conditions, yet they seek to clothe themselves with the same aura of reliability that manufacturing sampling processes for QC have earned. As you state in the referenced article, at best, polls can give an indication of momentum, but cannot attest to its depth or longevity. Thank you for your analysis. I look forward to reading your newsletter.
Thank you for explaining the odd ball polling. I have internally believed and seen Kamala doing very well as the latest early election numbers blatantly reveal. Your take on the polling numbers being monetarily skewed makes sense as even Trump himself gave away the game during the Stormy Daniels hush money trial. Some of the testimony was releated to calling a polling house to ask how much it would be for a skewed poll. When the Trump campaign has near endless billionaire money. What we see is the innevitable result. The majority of folks joyessly supporting Kamala Harris and voting in droves (ie Georgia) and the polls telling us something completely different. Polls as gaslighting and discouragement just like you said.
No need for one other word, you have said it all and I am deeply grateful.
β¨Excellent read, Sam ! I completely agree with you about the manipulation one can do with polls. β¨
EXCELLENT article!πππππ
πNAMASTEπ